Elon Musk’s bankruptcy warnings collide with JPMorgan’s first Bitcoin forecast

Loading image

Musk says the US will go broke without AI and robots, while JPMorgan Asset Management now pencils in a 10% annual return for Bitcoin

Sat 7 Nov 2026 · 07:37 EST · 3 min read

In Bitcoin

Share

Elon Musk has a new item on his worry list. The Tesla and SpaceX chief, described by Forbes as the world’s first trillionaire, has paired his long-running warnings about financial collapse with fresh fears about an artificial intelligence-driven nightmare.

His latest message is a warning of “global bankruptcy.” Forbes suggests it could become a game-changer for the Bitcoin price, and it lands just as JPMorgan rolls out a Bitcoin forecast that Forbes called “extraordinary.”

Musk’s math: robots or ruin

During a February 2026 appearance on the Dwarkesh Podcast, he put his confidence level well past the usual scale.

“We are 1000% going to go bankrupt as a country and fail as a country without AI and robots.”

Musk’s view is that the US cannot outgrow its debt with today’s economy. Only a big jump in productivity from AI and robotics would let the country cover what it owes. Without that jump, he argues, the bill eventually wins.

US national debt passed $40 trillion in late 2026, according to the research findings. Interest payments on that debt are reported to exceed military spending.

This is where Musk’s two fears meet. He frames AI as both a possible threat and the only realistic escape hatch from the debt spiral.

JPMorgan puts a number on Bitcoin

JPMorgan Asset Management included Bitcoin in its Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions report for the first time in October 2026. That annual report is where the firm lays out its expected returns for major asset classes over the coming decade.

The headline figure: a projected 10% annualized return for Bitcoin through 2036. The research findings note that this outpaces JPMorgan’s forecasts for traditional holdings such as large-cap US stocks and bonds.

The reasoning rests on supply. Bitcoin’s issuance is capped, while the broader money supply keeps expanding.

That logic lines up neatly with how Musk talks about Bitcoin. He has described it as “based on energy” and contrasted it with fiat currency, which governments can print without a hard limit.

Musk’s companies are already holding the bag

Tesla holds 11,509 BTC, while SpaceX holds 18,712 BTC, according to the research findings. Together that comes to approximately 30,221 BTC, reportedly acquired at low average costs.

That gives Musk a direct stake in how markets interpret his warnings. Few public figures warning about fiscal collapse also run two companies sitting on a large position in the asset most often pitched as a hedge against it.

To be fair, there is no evidence that his statements are designed to move the market. But anyone reading his posts should know where the corporate treasuries sit.

Why the debt story and the Bitcoin story keep crossing paths

The connection between government debt and Bitcoin is not new. Bitcoin’s original design was a response to concerns about centralized money and unchecked issuance.

The research findings are explicit that no single Musk statement has been conclusively tied to an immediate Bitcoin price move.

What this means for investors

The most significant development here is arguably JPMorgan’s, not Musk’s. A formal return assumption from JPMorgan Asset Management is different. Long-term capital market assumptions feed into how advisers and institutions think about portfolio construction. Bitcoin showing up in that framework signals that it is being treated as an asset class worth modeling, rather than a curiosity.

A 10% forecast is also not a guarantee. Forecasts of this kind are long-range estimates, and a decade is plenty of time for assumptions to break.

For now, the practical watch list is short. Track US fiscal policy and debt-servicing costs, monitor whether other large asset managers follow JPMorgan in publishing Bitcoin assumptions, and keep an eye on any changes to Tesla’s and SpaceX’s holdings.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.